MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2155250989 · doi:10.1109/pacrim.1991.160696

Adaptive signal-subspace processing based on first-order perturbation analysis

2002· article· en· W2155250989 on OpenAlexaff
Benoı̂t Champagne

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDirection-of-Arrival Estimation Techniques
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubspace topologyArray processingCovariance matrixAlgorithmOrthonormal basisSignal processingPerturbation (astronomy)Nonlinear systemApplied mathematicsRecursion (computer science)MathematicsNarrowbandCurse of dimensionalitySignal subspaceCovarianceComputer scienceDigital signal processingMathematical analysisArtificial intelligencePhysicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An approach to adaptive signal-subspace processing of narrowband array data is presented. It is based on the application of first-order perturbation analysis. In the proposed approach, the correction term in the recursive estimate of the array covariance matrix at time k is viewed as a perturbation of the estimate at time k-1. Following this interpretation, the theory of perturbation of Hermitian matrices is applied in order to obtain a new recursion expressing the eigenstructure estimate of R/sub x/(k), the true array covariance matrix at time k, in terms of the eigenstructure estimate of R/sub x/(k-1). This algorithm can be realized by means of L linear combiners with nonlinear weight-vector adaptation equations, where L is the signal-subspace dimensionality. These nonlinear adaptation equations appear to be substitutes for the orthonormal weight constraints found in other algorithms. The results of preliminary simulations are discussed.< <ETX xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">&gt;</ETX>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.726
Threshold uncertainty score0.395

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicDirection-of-Arrival Estimation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207