The French Colonial Legacy of the Canada–United States Border in Eastern North America, 1650–1783
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le développement des colonies européennes en Amérique du nord aux dix-septième et dix-huitième siècles était témoin des concours apparemment éternels de la terre, la souveraineté et le commerce. Les désaccords territoriaux nombreux, par example l'Acadie au Canada, ont articulé ces expressions géopolitiques contradictoires. Cet article explore l'évolution des concepts de frontière et des limites nationales, se concentrant sur les conditions qui ont incité des colonies et des états à changer les définitions territoriales au lieu d'adapter des ordres du jour complexes et décalants. Ces changements reflètent quatre étapes cruciales dans le développement des frontières politiques en Amérique du nord-est pendant ce temps: (1) action d'éviter et ajournement de la délimitation; (2) délimitation et concurrence; (3) frontières internes; et (4) formation de la frontière, ou limite, britannique de l'Amérique du nord. Ce travail fournit également une alternative aux études traditionnelles orientées vers les conflits de frontière en se concentrant sur des processus culturels et géopolitiques.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".