Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper examines the classical Arab poet Ibn Ar-Rayb’s poem “Malik Ibn Ar-Rayb Yarthy Nafsah”, “Malik Ibn Ar-Rayb mourning his own death”, to underline elegiac patterns in Arabic poetry and pave the way for comparative studies of self elegies and elegiac verse across cultures and languages. It is to be asserted that this study of Ibn Ar-Rayb’s self-elegy is not meant to exclude the abundant elegiac verse in Arab culture; rather, it is a case study of a representative example of an Arab poet who wrote an elegy in which he mourned his conceived death, a particular case of mourning. It turns out that the elegiac pattern of the poem adopts sorrow, sincerity, and praise at its core while emphasizing the qualities of the mind and the spirit, and transforming personal grief into universal philosophical statements on the futility of human existence, death, human relations, and poetic creativity. Poetry is celebrated as a distinction the loss of which to mourn, the power of which to pride oneself at, and the help of which to invoke in order to eloquently (still sincerely) express the situation of mourning and, at the same time, immortalize the poet. Keywords: Ibn Ar-Rayb; Arabic poetry; elegy; death; “riTHaa?” Resume: Cet article examine le poeme Malik Ibn Ar-Rayb Yarthy Nafsah - Malik Ibn Ar-Rayb en deuil de sa propre d'un poete arabe classique Ibn Ar-Rayb, afin de souligner les modeles elegiaque dans la poesie arabe et ouvrir la voie a des etudes comparatives des auto-elegies et des vers elegiaques a travers les cultures et les langues. Il doit etre affirme que cette etude sur l'auto-elegie d'Ibn Ar-Rayb n'est pas destinee a exclure les versets elegiaques abondants dans la culture arabe; c'est plutot une etude de cas d'un exemple representatif d'un poete arabe qui a ecrit une elegie dans laquelle il a pleure sa mort imaginee, un cas particulier de deuil. Il s'avere que le modele elegiaque du poeme adopte la douleur, la sincerite, et la louange a la base tout en mettant l'accent sur les qualites de la pensee et de l'esprit, et en transformant la douleur personnelle en enonces philosophiques universels sur la futilite de l'existence humaine, la mort, les relations humaines , et la creativite poetique. La poesie est celebree comme une distinction dont la perte est a deplorer, la puissance est a faire l'honneur, et l'aide de laquelle est a invoquer afin d'exprimer eloquement (encore sincerement) la situation de deuil et, en meme temps, immortaliser le poete.Mots-cles: Ibn Ar-Rayb; poesie arabe; elegie, mort; riTHaa?
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.015 | 0.016 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".