MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2155315243 · doi:10.1177/002199830003400502

Prediction of Failure in Unsaturated Polyester Reinforced by Plain Weave Glass Fabric

2000· article· en· W2155315243 on OpenAlexaff
H. Nguyen-Hoa, Toan Vu‐Khanh

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Composite Materials · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMechanical Behavior of Composites
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceComposite materialUltimate tensile strengthPlain weaveComposite numberGlass fiberDeformation (meteorology)PolyesterShear (geology)Compressive strengthFiberPolyester resinYarn

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Polyester/glass fiber is probably by far the most commonly used composite. This paper presents the results of an investigation on the failure of this composite made with a plain weave glass fabric. A recently proposed sub-plies model is utilized to predict the failure strengths of the fabric composite after shear deformation of the interlaced yarns, induced by the forming process. A procedure for the determination of the equivalent on-axis tensile and compressive strengths of the constituent plies is also proposed to take into account the fiber undulation effect on strength performance. The predicted compressive and tensile strengths are compared with experimental measurement as a function of the deformation angle of the interlaced yarns. Furthermore, the onset of damage is also compared with the initial failure predicted by the sub-plies model. The predicted results are in good agreement with the experimental data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.785

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Composite MaterialsSame topicMechanical Behavior of CompositesFrench-language works237,207