Relationship of Dietary Antimicrobial Drug Administration with Broiler Performance, Decreased Population Levels of Lactobacillus salivarius, and Reduced Bile Salt Deconjugation in the Ileum of Broiler Chickens
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Straight-run broiler chickens were raised either in floor pens or wire-floored cages (trial 1) or in floor pens only (trials 2, 3, and 4). Birds raised in floor pens had lower BW and feed intakes than those raised in cages. The administration of bacitracin in the feed increased feed intake from d 12 to d 35, decreased the feed conversion ratio during the same period in trial 2, and improved the weight gain of broilers from d 0 to 10 in trial 3. The concentrations of conjugated bile salts (taurocholic and taurochenodeoxycholic acids) were higher in the ileal contents of broilers administered the antimicrobials compared with untreated birds. Supplementation of the feed with monensin increased fat digestibility in the ileum of the birds. Although total numbers of bacteria in ileal contents were the same regardless of whether antimicrobials were administered or not, the bacterial community differed qualitatively. Populations of Lactobacillus salivarius were reduced in birds fed antimicrobials relative to untreated broilers. A representative ileal isolate of L. salivarius deconjugated bile salts in pure culture in the laboratory and in the ileal contents of ex-Lactobacillus-free chickens maintained in a protective environment and colonized by the Lactobacillus isolate. These observations provide a link between bile salt deconjugation in the ileum by L. salivarius and decreased weight gain of broilers. Lactobacillus salivarius populations could be targeted in future studies aimed at modification of the ileal bacterial community to achieve growth promotion of broilers without the administration of antimicrobial drugs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".