MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2155340382 · doi:10.2307/3685706

The Le Pen Moment

2003· article· en· W2155340382 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Richard J. Golsan

Bibliographic record

VenueSubStance · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsParadeNothingNazismGuitarArt historyArtShot (pellet)RifleFront (military)HistoryCartographyArchaeologyEngineeringGeographyGermanPhilosophyManagement

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

On July 14, 2002, a 25-year-old neo-Nazi named Maxime Brunerie drove a rented car from suburban Courcouronnes to Paris for the Bastille Day parade along the Champs Elysees. He carried a guitar case containing a .22 rifle he had recently purchased. The day before, on the British neo-Nazi website Combat 18 (18 signifying AH, the first and eighth letters of the alphabet, the initials of Adolph Hitler), Brunerie had posted a message: Watch television on Sunday, I'll be the star. At the parade site, Brunerie blended in with the crowd. As President Jacques Chirac's vehicle approached, Brunerie extracted the rifle from the guitar case and took aim. According to most accounts, he managed to get off one shot before the person in front of him, a 56-year-old Alsatian nurse named Jacques Weber, grabbed the barrel and wrested the gun from him. The wouldbe assassin was then wrestled to the ground by, among others, a French Canadian of Algerian descent, Mohamet Chelali. The following day, Chirac phoned Weber and Chelali to thank them. Interviewed in Le Monde, both men expressed no desire to be considered heroes. As Weber put it, Nothing could be more normal than to act like that under the circumstances. But to recover from the emotional shock of the

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.994
Threshold uncertainty score0.679

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0080.002
Scholarly communication0.0120.007
Open science0.0010.007
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.5240.314

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSubStanceSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207