MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W21553404 · doi:10.1038/nrc3049

Assessment of ANFO on the Environment

2010· article· en· W21553404 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sylvie Brochu

Bibliographic record

VenueNature reviews. Cancer · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAnalytical chemistry methods development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExplosive materialAmmonium nitrateAmmunitionGroundwaterNitrateEnvironmental scienceWaste managementContaminationEnvironmental engineeringNitriteDetonationEngineeringChemistryGeotechnical engineeringGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract : In September 2008, DRDC Valcartier was tasked by Director Ammunition and Explosives Management and Engineering (DAEME 3-4) to perform a literature review to assess the effect of Ammonium Nitrate Fuel Oil (ANFO) on the environment and to determine its suitability for service. The Canadian Forces are concerned about the high solubility of ammonium nitrate (AN) that could represent a potential threat to the environment. For example, the detonation of ANFO is often incomplete in a wet environment, leaving behind by-products of unreacted AN as nitrate, nitrite and ammonia into the soil and groundwater. Since groundwater is a critical water source for many humans and animals in isolated locations, all efforts should be directed in preventing water supply contamination. Proper measures must therefore be followed when ANFO is used as a blasting explosive. General guidelines found in the literature are reviewed in this memorandum.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.808
Threshold uncertainty score0.985

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.367
Teacher spread0.341 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNature reviews. CancerSame topicAnalytical chemistry methods developmentFrench-language works237,207