MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2155355703 · doi:10.1109/tmag.2010.2044025

A 2-D Robust FE-FV Mixed Method to Handle Strong Nonlinearities in Superconductors

2010· article· en· W2155355703 on OpenAlexaff
Abelin Kameni, Smaïl Mezani, Frédéric Sirois, Denis Netter, Jean Lévêque, Bruno Douine

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Magnetics · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPhysics of Superconductivity and Magnetism
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSuperconductivityNonlinear systemMagnetic fieldCondensed matter physicsPhysicsCylinderCurrent densityCurrent (fluid)Field (mathematics)Power (physics)Materials scienceApplied mathematicsMathematical analysisMathematicsThermodynamicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A robust numerical method based on 2-D mixed finite-elements-finite volumes (FE-FV) allows the solution of diffusion problems in superconducting (SC) materials. The proposed approach handles the strong nonlinearity of the E(J) constitutive power law of high-temperature superconductors (HTS). The method is tested for a SC cylinder submitted to a sinusoidal transport current or to a transverse sinusoidal external field. The current density distributions as well as the AC losses are computed. Comparisons to a FE analyses that use the magnetic field as state variable show the validity of the proposed approach. It can be seen that the proposed method is very stable even for large n-values for which the FE method does not converge.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on MagneticsSame topicPhysics of Superconductivity and MagnetismFrench-language works237,207