MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2155360759 · doi:10.1093/jexbot/51.344.529

Endo-beta-mannanase activity increases in the skin and outer pericarp of tomato fruits during ripening

2000· article· en· W2155360759 on OpenAlexaff
J. Derek Bewley

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Experimental Botany · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPolysaccharides and Plant Cell Walls
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRipeningLycopersiconSofteningEnzymeEnzyme assayChemistryCultivarHorticultureBiologyBiochemistryBotany

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Activity of endo-beta-mannanase increases during ripening of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) fruit of the cultivar Trust. beta-Mannoside mannohydrolase is also present during ripening, but its pattern of activity is different from that of endo-beta-mannanase. The increase in endo-beta-mannanase activity is greatest in the skin, and less in the outer and inner pericarp regions. This enzyme is probably bound to the walls of the outermost cell layers of the fruit during ripening, and it requires a high-salt buffer for effective extraction. The enzyme protein, as detected immunologically on Western blots, is present during the early stages of ripening, before any enzyme activity is detectable. The mRNA for the enzyme is also present at these stages; endo-beta-mannanase may be produced and sequestered in a mature-sized inactive form during early ripening. Most non-ripening mutants of tomato exhibit reduced softening and lower endo-beta-mannanase activity, but a cause-and-effect relationship between the enzyme and ripening is unlikely because some cultivars which ripen normally do not exhibit any endo-beta-mannanase activity in the fruit.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.339
Threshold uncertainty score0.594

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations69
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Experimental BotanySame topicPolysaccharides and Plant Cell WallsFrench-language works237,207