MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2155368461

Exploring the implications and impact of smartphones on learning dynamics: The role of self-directed learning

2011· article· en· W2155368461 on OpenAlex
Maurício Camargo, Raphaël Bary, Vincent Boly, Michael Rees, Richard Smith

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venue2011 17th International Conference on Concurrent Enterprising · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMobile Learning in Education
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProcess (computing)Computer scienceAutodidacticismExperiential learningHuman–computer interactionMultimediaKnowledge managementPsychologyMathematics education
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Large diffusion of mobile learning applications in recent years raises several questions on the dynamics of the learning process and the learner profile. The present paper will study the smart phone based learning process and the main factors influencing it. Contribution of the self-directed learning and a comprehensive discussion on how it could support the mobile learning process will be made. To finish a framework of the mobile-based learning will be proposed which will be used in further experiences. This research highlights the first step of the self-directed learning application life cycle steps: the elaboration of mobile learning content is described explaining the integration of the future users in this design process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.548
Threshold uncertainty score0.488

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.074
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it