MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2155372894 · doi:10.1139/v00-016

Comparative electronic analysis between hydrogen transfers in the CH<sub>4</sub>/CH<sub>3</sub><sup>+</sup>, CH<sub>4</sub>/CH<sub>3</sub><sup></sup>, and CH<sub>4</sub>/CH<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup> systems: on the electronic nature of the hydrogen (H<sup>-</sup>, H<sup></sup>, H<sup>+</sup>) being transferred. II. Analysis of electron-pair interactions from intracule and extracule densities

2000· article· en· W2155372894 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Xavier Fradera, Miquel Duran, Jordi Mestres

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Chemistry · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Chemical Physics Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryHydrideElectron transferElectronHydrogenAtomic physicsElectron localization functionElectron densityHydrogen atomProtonCrystallographyPhysical chemistryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The nature of the hydrogen transferred in the CH3/CH4+, CH3/CH4·, and CH3/CH4- systems is investigated by analyzing the topology of the contracted intracule and extracule electron-pair densities and their respective Laplacians. The CH3/CH4+, CH3/CH4·, and CH3/CH4- systems are taken as simple models for the study of hydride (H-), hydrogen (H·), and proton (H+) transfer reactions, respectively, under a constrained C-C distance. The study is focused on the comparison of the intracule and extracule densities at the intermediate structures for the three H-transfer reactions, complementing a previous investigation of the same model reactions based on the analysis of one-electron densities. The results obtained by analyzing the contracted electron-pair densities are consistent with those obtained from the analysis of one-electron densities. The electronic nature of the H atom being transferred in the three systems can be differentiated by the topologies of the corresponding intracule and extracule densities. However, the analysis underlies also the difficulties to interpretation of the topologies of contracted electron-pair densities, as different electron-electron interactions may contribute to the same point in the intracule or extracule spaces. In particular, for the systems studied, the contribution of the electron-electron interaction associated to the probability of having two electrons on the H being transferred is not reflected separately neither in the intracule nor in the extracule distributions. Nevertheless, the nature of the H being transferred can still be studied by comparing the importance of the electron-electron interactions associated to the probability of having one electron in C and one in the transferring H. The effects of inclusion of electron correlation are also discussed by means of (HF-CISD//HF) intracule and extracule density difference maps.Key words: hydrogen transfer, electron-pair density, intracule density, extracule density, topological density analyisis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of ChemistrySame topicAdvanced Chemical Physics StudiesFrench-language works237,207