Brownian dynamics of a compressed polymer brush model. Off-equilibrium response as a function of surface coverage and compression rate
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We study the compressive behaviour of a polymer-covered surface (i.e., a "polymer brush") using Brownian dynamics simulations. The model consists of grafted chains with variable flexibility, variable intra- and inter-chain interactions, as well as different surface coverage. We discuss the polymer brush response to confinement by considering variable rates of compression under a hard plane. Our results show a small degree of inter-chain entanglement, regardless of whether the interaction is attractive or merely excluded volume. We observe that the molecular shape depends strongly on the surface coverage. Dense brushes exhibit a limited degree of lateral deformation under compression; instead, chains undergo a transition that produces a local patch with near-solid packing. This effect due to surface density can be undone partially by increasing the attractive nature of the chain interaction, by modulating the rate of compression, or by allowing "soft anchoring", i.e., the possible Brownian drift of the grafting bead on the surface. We have also studied the polymer brush relaxation while maintaining the compressing plane, as well as after its sudden removal. We find evidence that also the relaxation depends on surface density; dense brushes appear to be configurationally frustrated at high compression and are unable to undergo swelling, regardless of the pressure applied.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".