MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2155415209 · doi:10.1080/0269249x.2011.639145

A readily available SEM substrate for a random orientation of diatom frustules

2011· article· en· W2155415209 on OpenAlexafffund
Michael L. MacGillivary, James M. Ehrman

Bibliographic record

VenueDiatom Research · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicDiatoms and Algae Research
Canadian institutionsMount Allison University
FundersDalhousie University
KeywordsDiatomSubstrate (aquarium)PhonographOrientation (vector space)Morphology (biology)Materials sciencePolycarbonateGeologyComposite materialOceanographyPaleontologyAcousticsGeometryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The surface of a vinyl phonograph record was used for SEM imaging of the valves of the centric diatom Paralia Heiberg. This simple method allowed the imaging of various orientations and views of diatom valves without tilting or rotating the SEM stage. This mounting method proved to be more efficient than using traditional flat substrates such as cover slips or polycarbonate filters. Additionally, playing the phonograph record with mounted diatoms prior to SEM imaging fractured some Paralia valves and allowed the viewing of internal morphology. The use of this SEM substrate would be beneficial for other diatom species where it is difficult to match valve and face view morphology, and for species where producing different orientations of the valve is laborious.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.038

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.158
GPT teacher head0.374
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDiatom ResearchSame topicDiatoms and Algae ResearchFrench-language works237,207