MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2155438227 · doi:10.1109/pac.2003.1288987

The ISAC-II upgrade at TRIUMF - progress and developments

2004· article· en· W2155438227 on OpenAlexaff
Robert Laxdal, G.S. Clark, G. Dutto, K. Fong, A.K. Mitra, R. Poirier, W. R. Rawnsley, T. Ries, I. Sekachev, G. Stanford

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicParticle accelerators and beam dynamics
Canadian institutionsTRIUMF
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUpgradeLinear particle acceleratorBooster (rocketry)PhysicsNuclear physicsHeavy ionNuclear engineeringComputer scienceIonEngineeringOperating systemBeam (structure)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

TRIUMF is proceeding with a major upgrade to the ISAC project, ISAC-II, that includes the addition of 43 MV of heavy ion superconducting linear accelerator and an ECR charge state booster. An initial installation of 18 MV of mid beta cavities (/spl beta/ = 5.8%, 7.1%) is due for commissioning in 2005. The paper will describe the superconducting linac program at TRIUMF including the status of the production cavities, the design of the medium beta cryomodule and a summary of the activities of the SCRF laboratory.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.045

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicParticle accelerators and beam dynamicsFrench-language works237,207