MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2155439723 · doi:10.1109/tcomm.2006.881338

Performance of an ultra-wideband communication system in the presence of narrowband BPSK- and QPSK-modulated OFDM interference

2006· article· en· W2155439723 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Communications · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUltra-Wideband Communications Technology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhase-shift keyingAdditive white Gaussian noiseInterference (communication)NarrowbandElectronic engineeringKeyingWidebandBit error rateMinimum-shift keyingGaussian noiseComputer scienceModulation (music)Ultra-widebandOrthogonal frequency-division multiplexingAdjacent-channel interferenceCommunications systemTelecommunicationsWhite noisePhysicsAlgorithmEngineeringAcousticsDecoding methodsChannel (broadcasting)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An analysis is derived for calculating the bit-error probability of an ultra-wideband (UWB) communication system operating with binary phase-shift keying and quaternary phase-shift keying narrowband interference in additive white Gaussian noise. The analytical expressions are valid when phase transitions of the interfering symbols can be ignored. The accuracy of the Gaussian approximation is assessed, and several modulation schemes proposed for UWB communication are evaluated in terms of capability of interference suppression.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.066
Threshold uncertainty score0.638

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it