MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2155440695 · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(05)70255-2

Chemotherapy-induced neutropenia and treatment efficacy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a pooled analysis of three randomised trials

2005· review· en· W2155440695 on OpenAlexaff
Massimo Di Maïo, Cesare Gridelli, Ciro Gallo, Frances A. Shepherd, Franco Vito Piantedosi, S. Cigolari, Luigi Manzione, Alfonso Illiano, Santi Barbera, Sergio Robbiati, Luciano Frontini, Elena Piazza, Giovanni Pietro Ianniello, Enzo Veltri, Federico Castiglione, Francesco Rosetti, Vittorio Gebbia, Lesley Seymour, Paolo Chiodini, Francesco Perrone

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Lancet Oncology · 2005
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
Canadian institutionsQueen's UniversityUniversity of TorontoPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
FundersNational Cancer InstituteAssociazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro
KeywordsVinorelbineMedicineGemcitabineNeutropeniaInternal medicineChemotherapyHazard ratioLung cancerClinical endpointSurgeryOncologyClinical trialCisplatinConfidence interval

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.977
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0090.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.092
GPT teacher head0.457
Teacher spread0.364 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations230
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueThe Lancet OncologySame topicLung Cancer Treatments and MutationsFrench-language works237,207