MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2155441721 · doi:10.1103/physrevd.92.054034

Bottomonium mesons and strategies for their observation

2015· article· en· W2155441721 on OpenAlexafffund
Stephen Godfrey, Kenneth Moats

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D, Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicParticle physics theoretical and experimental studies
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPhysicsParticle physicsAnnihilationMesonHadronRadiative transferProduction (economics)Large Hadron ColliderOrder (exchange)QuarkExcited stateQuark modelQuarkoniumNuclear physicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The $B$-factories and Large Hadron Collider experiments have demonstrated the ability to observe and measure the properties of bottomonium mesons. In order to discover missing states it is useful to know their properties to develop a successful search strategy. To this end we calculate the masses and decay properties of excited bottomonium states. We use the relativized quark model to calculate the masses and wave functions and the ${^{3}P}_{0}$ quark-pair creation model to calculate decay widths to open bottom. We also summarize results for radiative transitions, annihilation decays, hadronic transitions and production cross sections which are used to develop strategies to find these states. We find that the $b\overline{b}$ system has a rich spectroscopy that we expect to be substantially extended by the LHC and ${e}^{+}{e}^{\ensuremath{-}}$ experiments in the near future. Some of the most promising possibilities at the LHC are observing the ${\ensuremath{\chi}}_{b(1,2)}(3P)$, ${\ensuremath{\chi}}_{b(1,2)}(4P)$ and ${\ensuremath{\eta}}_{b}(3S)$ states in $\ensuremath{\gamma}{\ensuremath{\mu}}^{+}{\ensuremath{\mu}}^{\ensuremath{-}}$ final states that proceed via radiative transitions through $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Upsilon}}(nS)$ intermediate states and $1{^{3}D}_{J}$ and $2{^{3}D}_{J}$ into $\ensuremath{\gamma}\ensuremath{\gamma}{\ensuremath{\mu}}^{+}{\ensuremath{\mu}}^{\ensuremath{-}}$ final states proceeding via $1{^{3}P}_{J}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}1{^{3}S}_{1}$ and $2{^{3}P}_{J}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}2{^{3}S}_{1}$ intermediate states respectively. Some of the most interesting possibilities in ${e}^{+}{e}^{\ensuremath{-}}$ collisions are studying the $1{^{3}D}_{J}$ states via $4\ensuremath{\gamma}$ cascades starting with the $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Upsilon}}(3S)$ and the $3{^{3}P}_{J}$ states in $\ensuremath{\gamma}\ensuremath{\gamma}{\ensuremath{\mu}}^{+}{\ensuremath{\mu}}^{\ensuremath{-}}$ final states starting with the $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Upsilon}}(4S)$ and proceeding via $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Upsilon}}(nS)$ intermediate states. Completing the bottomonium spectrum is an important validation of lattice QCD calculations and a test of our understanding of bottomonium states in the context of the quark model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.053
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.344
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations162
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D, Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmologySame topicParticle physics theoretical and experimental studiesFrench-language works237,207