MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Risk factors precipitating exacerbations in adult asthma patients presenting at Kalafong Hospital, Pretoria

2008· article· en· W2155464418 on OpenAlex
MM Geyser, Paul Rheeder

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueSouth African Family Practice · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAsthma and respiratory diseases
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAsthmaEmergency departmentPublic healthPopulationPediatricsPathophysiology of asthmaAsthma exacerbationsEmergency medicineEnvironmental healthInternal medicinePsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Research into asthma is proceeding at an unprecedented rate and yet we live with a disease that escalates in prevalence and severity, despite a greater understanding of its pathophysiology and the necessary therapy. The total prevalence of asthma is estimated to lie at 7.2% of the world's population (6% in adults, 10% in children). Data from Australia, Canada and Spain report that acute asthma accounted for 1 to 12% of all adult emergency department visits. The prevalence of asthma in South Africa lies at 5% for adults and 10% for children. Asthma is reported as taking up 1 to 2% of the total health budget in direct costs, with equally large indirect costs being incurred for time lost from work and reduced productivity. It has also been reported that approximately one-third of the direct care costs of asthma are attributable to emergency department visits and hospitalisations. In some cases, exposure may be unavoidable (for example exposures to cold air, exercise or the asthma-inducing effects of pregnancy). Many studies have been done in other countries on specific triggers, especially allergens and viral respiratory infections. However, circumstances differ in the public sector in South Africa and other factors such as compliance and under-treatment, which may be applicable, should be studied in contention.Methods: A matched case-control study was undertaken matched on age and gender between December 2003 and May 2005. Known asthma patients with exacerbations presenting at Kalafong Hospital's emergency unit were chosen as cases. Controls were stable asthma patients recruited from the outpatient departments. A structured questionnaire was used to interview patients concerning their possible exposure to certain triggers and risk factors. Univariate and multivariate analyses with conditional logistic regression were done to determine any significant exposures. Participants were between 18 and 65 years of age.Results: In total, 356 patients were evaluated. Fifty cases and 100 controls were enrolled. Cases were shown to be more non-compliant than controls (OR = 2.18; 95% Confidence interval (CI): 1.09 to 4.38, p = 0.03). Missing follow-up doctor's appointments for the last six months were statistically significant with an OR of 2.39 (95% CI 1.08 to 5.27) and p = 0.03.Conclusions: Non-compliance was a strong predictor of exacerbations in adult asthma patients at Kalafong Hospital.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it