MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2155480523 · doi:10.1097/moh.0b013e32833865e6

Multifaceted role of vascular endothelial growth factor signaling in adult tissue physiology: an emerging concept with clinical implications

2010· review· en· W2155480523 on OpenAlexaff
Hoon‐Ki Sung, Iacovos P. Michael, András Nagy

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Opinion in Hematology · 2010
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAngiogenesis and VEGF in Cancer
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoLunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research InstituteMount Sinai Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVascular endothelial growth factorAngiogenesisBiologyPathologicalHomeostasisVascular endothelial growth factor ANeurosciencePhysiologyBioinformaticsPathologyMedicineCancer researchVEGF receptorsEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: In addition to the crucial role of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)A in vessel development, it has become apparent that the VEGF signaling pathway (VSP) plays an important role during adulthood in the maintenance of tissue homeostasis in normal physiological processes, as well as in pathological conditions. This review will focus on the role of the VSP for proper function of many organs in adult life. RECENT FINDINGS: Although adult angiogenesis is essentially quiescent--with the exception for wound healing and the menstrual cycle--manipulations of the VSP in mice have revealed its much broader and essential role in adult physiology and pathological conditions. Although suppression of the VSP is a promising clinical approach to treat cancer and age-related macular degeneration, it is associated with severe side effects. These adverse reactions caused by systemic VSP suppression in patients and the knowledge that has been gained from mouse models have contributed to our increasing understanding of the vast spectrum of functions that can be attributed to VEGF. SUMMARY: We will review the multifaceted role of VEGF signaling in adult life and highlight how genetic approaches have verified and explained the spectrum of side effects of antiangiogenic therapies using systemic modulation of the VSP. The fascinating parallels that become evident calls for the development of further animal models to address specific questions that could have implications in disease treatments targeting the VSP.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.070
GPT teacher head0.419
Teacher spread0.349 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent Opinion in HematologySame topicAngiogenesis and VEGF in CancerFrench-language works237,207