Chemical reactions at surfaces and interfaces from first principles: Theory and application
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The last decade has seen rapid expansion and development in the field of density functional theory (DFT) simulation on the complex chemical processes that occur at surfaces and interfaces. The understanding of the phenomena in surface science and heterogeneous catalysis has benefited tremendously from these quantum mechanic calculations. This article reviews current progress in the theory of reactions on surfaces, in particular, those relevant to the barrier and the active site of surface reactions. Two representative reactions, namely, NO dissociation and CO oxidation, are selected to illustrate how these theoretical concepts are applied to understand catalytic reactions. Here, the pathways and energetics of these reactions under various catalytic conditions are described in detail, and the understanding of the reactions is generalized. It is concluded that DFT-based methods can be well applied to catalysis to understand the electronic structure of chemical processes and to elucidate mechanisms of complex surface reactions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it