Robust observer-based fault diagnosis for an unmanned aerial vehicle
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, a new robust fault detection and isolation (FDI) methodology for an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) is proposed. The fault diagnosis scheme is constructed based on observer-based techniques according to fault models corresponding to each component (actuator, sensor, and structure). The proposed fault diagnosis method takes advantage of the structural perturbation of the UAV model due to the icing (the main structural fault in aircraft), sensor, and actuator faults to reduce the error of observers that are used in the FDI module in addition to distinguishing among faults in different components. Moreover, the accuracy of the FDI module is increased by considering the structural perturbation of the UAV linear model due to wind disturbances which is the major environmental disturbance affecting an aircraft. Our envisaged FDI strategy is capable of diagnosing recurrent faults through properly designed residuals with different responses to different types of faults. Simulation results are provided to illustrate and demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed FDI approach due to faults in sensors, actuators, and structural components of unmanned aerial vehicles.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".