Toxicity of imidacloprid (Nicotinoid) against earthworm, Pheretima posthuma with reference to its effects on protein.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Imidaclorprid was studied for its effects on earthworm (P. posthuma). The organism was reared in laboratory at 25 °C with relative humidity 80%, in whole moist soil with compost / manure as food medium contained in wide mouth jars covered with muslin cloth. Imidacloprid (Nicotinoid) was used as test material. Earthworms were exposed to the under test compound through contact method cum feeding method. Average mortalities of imidacloprid were found to be 20, 40, 60, 70 and 80%, against 0.04, 0.08, 0.16, 0.32, and 0.64 ppm respectively and LD50 was determined statistically and found to be 0.11 ppm. Effect of this pesticide on total protein content was determined in head, clitellum and abdominal regions of treated earthworm P. posthuma. Protein was found to be 21.6 mg/ml in head region, in clitellum region it was found to be 36.6, and 30.9 mg/ml in abdominal region respectively, whereas in the control batches it was 27.7, 26.1 and 30.3 mg/ml in head, clitellum and abdominal region respectively. This pattern indicates an increase in protein contents in the clitellum region, a decrease in head region and almost unaffected protein contents was found in the abdominal regions under the effects of imidacloprid on earthworms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".