Bibliographic record
Abstract
Existe-t-il un néoconservatisme canadien ? De nombreux analystes de politique étrangère canadienne utilisent ce terme pour décrire le gouvernement Harper et l’« école de Calgary », sans toutefois conceptualiser précisément l’objet politique dont il est question. Certains affirment même qu’il s’agit d’une idéologie importée des États-Unis. Cet article montre d’abord la « reconnaissance » que les néoconservateurs américains accordent à leurs homologues canadiens, et vice versa, illustrant ainsi la proximité idéologique entre les deux néoconservatismes. Cependant, dans la deuxième portion de l’article est proposée une définition générique du néoconservatisme, montrant que, s’il est juste de parler de néoconservatisme pour décrire Harper et l’« école de Calgary », il ne faut pas y voir une influence américaine. Le néoconservatisme canadien a ses particularités et sa tradition propres.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".