MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2155581205 · doi:10.1142/s0218127409022798

GLOBAL ANALYSIS ON n-SCROLL CHAOTIC ATTRACTORS OF MODIFIED CHUA'S CIRCUIT

2009· article· en· W2155581205 on OpenAlexafffund
Fei Xu, Pei Yu, Xiaoxin Liao

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicChaos control and synchronization
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsChua's circuitAttractorControl theory (sociology)Equilibrium pointMathematicsChaoticNonlinear systemConstructiveSynchronization (alternating current)ScrollSynchronization of chaosInvariant (physics)Stability (learning theory)Topology (electrical circuits)Computer scienceControl (management)Mathematical analysisDifferential equation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we present a further mathematical study on the report of existence of n-scroll chaotic attractors in a modified Chua's circuit. A series of results based on mathematical theory are given. First, we show that the chaotic attractors of the modified Chua's circuit are globally attractive, with estimations given for the globally attractive set and positive invariant set. Then, we study the positions, number and local stability of the equilibrium points. We also design simple feedback control laws to globally exponentially stabilize any given equilibrium point. Finally, we use the theory and methodology of absolute stability of Luré nonlinear control systems and nonlinear feedback control to exponentially synchronize two modified Chua's circuits with the same structure. The design of constructive feedback control laws for synchronization is also discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Bifurcation and ChaosSame topicChaos control and synchronizationFrench-language works237,207