MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2155642268 · doi:10.1109/twc.2008.060664

On partial transmit sequences for PAR reduction in OFDM systems

2008· article· en· W2155642268 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPAPR reduction in OFDM
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOrthogonal frequency-division multiplexingReduction (mathematics)Redundancy (engineering)Computer scienceComputational complexity theoryPreprocessorAlgorithmMathematicsMathematical optimizationChannel (broadcasting)Telecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Partial transmit sequences (PTS) is a popular technique to reduce the peak-to-average power ratio (PAR) in orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) systems. PTS is highly successful in PAR reduction and efficient redundancy utilization, but the considerable computational complexity for the required search through a high-dimensional vector space and the necessary transmission of side information (SI) to the receiver are potential problems for a practical implementation. In this paper, we revisit PTS for PAR reduction and tackle these two problems. To address the complexity issue, we formulate the search problem of PTS as a combinatorial optimization (CO) problem. This enables us to (i) unify various search strategies proposed earlier in the PTS literature and (ii) adapt efficient search algorithms known from the CO literature to PTS. We also propose a modified PTS objective function, which reduces the number of multiplications required for PTS. Numerical results show that, perhaps surprisingly, simple random search yields the best performance-complexity tradeoff for moderate PAR reduction, whereas two novel CO-based methods excel if close-to-optimum PAR reduction is desired. The SI transmission problem is solved by a simple preprocessing of the data stream before PAR reduction. This preprocessing introduces the minimal possible redundancy and allows SI embedding without affecting the PAR reduction capability of PTS or causing peak regrowth.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.565
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it