MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2155653432 · doi:10.1109/icarcv.2008.4795590

Automatic building detection in aerial and satellite images

2008· article· en· W2155653432 on OpenAlexaff
Parvaneh Saeedi, H. Zwick

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicRemote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceComputer visionArtificial intelligenceQuadrilateralLine (geometry)Aerial imageSatellite imagerySatelliteField (mathematics)Image (mathematics)Set (abstract data type)Remote sensingGeographyEngineeringMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Automatic creation of 3D urban city maps could be an innovative way for providing geometric data for varieties of applications such as civilian emergency situations, natural disaster management, military situations, and urban planning. Reliable and consistent extraction of quantitative information from remotely sensed imagery is crucial to the success of any of the above applications. This paper describes the development of an automated roof detection system from single monocular electro-optic satellite imagery. The system employs a fresh approach in which each input image is segmented at several levels. The border line definition of such segments combined with line segments detected on the original image are used to generate a set of quadrilateral rooftop hypotheses. For each hypothesis a probability score is computed that represents the evidence of true building according to the image gradient field and line segment definitions. The presented results demonstrate that the system is capable of detecting small gabled residential rooftops with variant light reflection properties with high positional accuracies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations36
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRemote Sensing and LiDAR ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207