MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2155655303 · doi:10.1525/aa.2001.103.2.468

The Idea of Power and the Power of Ideas: A Review Essay

2001· review· en· W2155655303 on OpenAlex
Stanley R. Barrett, Sean Stokholm, Jeanette Burke

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Anthropologist · 2001
Typereview
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAnthropological Studies and Insights
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPower (physics)Argument (complex analysis)CriticismSociologySocialismOrder (exchange)EpistemologyPhilosophyLawPolitical scienceEconomicsPolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In Envisioning Power , the late Eric Wolf, one of anthropology's most renowned practitioners, argues that the time has come to fuse power to ideas, not least of all in order to revitalize the concept of culture. His argument is explored in three notable case studies: the Kwakiutl, the Aztecs, and National Socialism in Germany. Our main criticism is that the concept of structural power favored by Wolf is redundant and expendable, partly because the case studies, while elegantly presented, are inappropriate for the author's theoretical interests, [power, culture, conflict]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.938
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.289
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.403
Teacher spread0.364 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it