MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2155668936 · doi:10.1177/0263211x000282003

Women Managing/Managing Women

2000· article· en· W2155668936 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueEducational Management & Administration · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicMentoring and Academic Development
Canadian institutionsSt. Francis Xavier University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNova scotiaLeadership styleIdentification (biology)Administration (probate law)Educational administrationField (mathematics)PedagogyEducational leadershipPsychologySociologyPublic relationsPolitical scienceHigher education

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Research has identified many barriers to female advancement in the field of educational administration and styles of leadership different from the traditional masculine model have been identified. A difficulty arises, not in the identification of difference, but in the recognition, legitimization and implementation of preferred modes of leadership for women in current administrative practice. This investigation focused on verbal accounts of the experiences of 21 female administrators in a rural Nova Scotia school district. This article presents the preliminary findings of these women’s own responses, resistances and initiatives in their attempt to legitimize and implement their preferred ways of providing leadership in this very rural setting.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.737
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0440.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it