A Double‐Dose Hepatitis B Vaccination Schedule in Travelers Presenting for Late Consultation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Vaccination against hepatitis B virus (HBV) is recommended for all travelers visiting HBV-endemic countries. However, travelers often present with insufficient time for the standard HBV vaccine schedule (SVS). We examined seroprotection against HBV following an alternative two-visit vaccination schedule (TVS) with currently available vaccine products, and completion rates with this TVS. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted in three travel clinics in British Columbia, Canada. Adults ≥20 years old traveling to an HBV-endemic country, and unable to complete the standard or rapid HBV vaccination schedule before departure, were offered a TVS that consisted of a double dose of HBV vaccine at day 0, followed by a single dose in 4 to 12 months. Immunity to HBV [anti-HBV surface antigen (HBs) ≥10 mIU/mL] was determined 1 to 6 months following the final dose of HBV vaccine. Logistic regression modeling was used to assess correlates of seroprotection. We also determined completion rate with this TVS at two clinics. RESULTS: In total, 117 participants (age range, 21-81 years, median age 57) met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 97 (82.9%) were immune after the TVS. Immunity was demonstrated in 93.1% of patients <50 years old and 79.5% of patients ≥50 years old. Increasing age was associated with reduced odds of developing immunity to HBV using the TVS [adjusted odds ratio = 0.954, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.904, 1.008]. The completion rate of the TVS was 32.6% over a 12-month period. Completion rates varied between clinics (23.5% vs 48.4%, p < 0.001), suggesting that clinic-specific follow-up policies were important. CONCLUSION: Seroprotection with completion of this TVS was similar to or exceeded that published in the literature for the SVS by age. However, even with a TVS, completion rates were low, underscoring the importance of follow-up. Further research is needed to determine whether travelers are protected prior to completion of this TVS.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".