Multiport averaging pitot tube to measure airflow rates from exhaust fans
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Multiport averaging Pitot tube to measure airflow rates from exhaust fans. Canadian Biosystems Engineering/Le génie des biosystèmes au Canada 50: 5.1- 5.7. Reliable airflow measurements for mechanically-ventilated animal confinement facilities are necessary to accurately determine gas emission rates. Instrumentation for this purpose must, however, be inexpensive, not intrusive, functional in very turbulent airflow, and robust under demanding field conditions. A multiport, averaging Pitot tube was constructed, calibrated in the laboratory using a standardized testing facility, and then tested and refined under simulated and actual field conditions as part of an airflow measurement system. Special features of the measurement system included a flow settling means, downstream orientation of the pressure inlets on the Pitot tube, and a physical filter to dampen pressure fluctuations in the signal line from the Pitot tube to the transducer. The relationship between the measurement signal and air
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it