MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2155697876 · doi:10.1586/era.10.191

Management of castration-resistant prostate cancer: bisphosphonates and emerging therapies

2010· review· en· W2155697876 on OpenAlexaff
Fred Saad, Marc Colombel

Bibliographic record

VenueExpert Review of Anticancer Therapy · 2010
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBone health and treatments
Canadian institutionsHôpital Notre-Dame
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineProstate cancerZoledronic acidOncologyCancerInternal medicineProstateBone painDiseaseBone metastasis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Approximately 70% of patients with prostate cancer will develop bone metastases that often lead to bone pain and skeletal-related events. Several bisphosphonates have shown promising activity for palliating pain. Only zoledronic acid has significantly delayed the onset and reduced the incidence of skeletal-related events in men with castration-resistant prostate cancer. In addition, studies suggest that bisphosphonates have anticancer activity that may prevent disease progression and improve survival. Clodronate was shown to improve survival in a study of men with metastatic androgen-sensitive prostate cancer. Emerging therapies are being investigated for their ability to maintain bone health. The findings presented herein highlight the importance of bone-targeted therapies for patients with bone metastases from prostate cancer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.849
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.413
Teacher spread0.378 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueExpert Review of Anticancer TherapySame topicBone health and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207