MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2155697908 · doi:10.1101/sqb.2007.72.025

Posttranslational Regulation of<i>Neurospora</i>Circadian Clock by CK1a-dependent Phosphorylation

2007· review· en· W2155697908 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Christina Querfurth, Axel Diernfellner, Fred H. Heise, Linda Lauinger, Andrea Neiss, Özgür Tataroğlu, Michael Brunner, Tobias Schafmeier

Bibliographic record

VenueCold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology · 2007
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMitochondrial Function and Pathology
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersFonds de Recherche du Québec - SantéDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftFonds der Chemischen Industrie
KeywordsNeurosporaCircadian clockPhosphorylationCircadian rhythmPost-translational regulationCell biologyBiological clockBiologyChemistryGeneticsNeuroscienceNeurospora crassaGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Frequency (FRQ) and its transcriptional activator, the White Collar Complex (WCC), are essential components of interconnected feedback loops of the circadian clock of Neurospora. In a negative feedback loop, FRQ inhibits the WCC by recruiting casein kinase 1a (CK1a) and supporting its phosphorylation. In an interconnected positive loop, FRQ supports accumulation of high levels of WCC. Phosphorylation of clock proteins is crucial for the temporal and spatial coordination of these functions. We identified three isoforms of CK1a generated by alternative splicing that all interact with FRQ. Furthermore, we show that WC-2 is phosphorylated by CK1a in vitro and that WC-2 phosphorylation is inhibited in vivo by the CK1-specific inhibitor IC261. Finally, we demonstrate that CK1a activity regulates levels of WC-2.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations42
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative BiologySame topicMitochondrial Function and PathologyFrench-language works237,207