MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2155740690 · doi:10.5539/jfr.v1n1p286

Global Food Crisis: Public Capital Expenditure and Agricultural Output in Nigeria

2012· article· en· W2155740690 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Suleiman G. Purokayo, Aminu Umaru

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Food Research · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicFiscal Policy and Economic Growth
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAgriculturePovertyEconomicsAgricultural economicsGovernment (linguistics)Capital expenditurePublic expenditureGovernment expenditureEconomic growthUnit (ring theory)Food securityDevelopment economicsCapital (architecture)BusinessGeographyFinanceMacroeconomicsPublic finance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The focus of this paper is to examine the effects of global food crisis on developing countries which most times are considered most vulnerable due to a number of factors ranging from conflicts in the region, to poverty and inequality, and factors that affect policies on agriculture. Issues concerning the use of food as alternative energy sources are still in its infant stages in Africa, and may not be relevant. The paper investigates the impact of capital expenditure on agriculture and credit to agricultural sector on the output of agriculture in Nigeria. Annual data covering 1990 – 2004 were used. Unit roots of the series were examined using Augmented Dickey – Fuller techniques. The overall results indicate that output of agriculture is positively related to capital expenditure on the sector but negatively related to the credit to agriculture. The paper therefore recommends improvements in government capital expenditure on agriculture. Credit policies and institutions should target beneficiaries (rural farmers).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.109
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Food ResearchSame topicFiscal Policy and Economic GrowthFrench-language works237,207