MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2155822479 · doi:10.1109/icme.2010.5583556

Pixel-based motion vector concatenation for Reference Picture Selection

2010· article· en· W2155822479 on OpenAlex
Hadi Hadizadeh, Ivan V. Bajić

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicVideo Coding and Compression Technologies
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConcatenation (mathematics)Computer scienceMotion vectorArtificial intelligenceContext (archaeology)Selection (genetic algorithm)Video qualityBlock-matching algorithmBlock (permutation group theory)PixelComputer visionMotion estimationTranscodingPattern recognition (psychology)Video trackingVideo processingImage (mathematics)Mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reference Picture Selection (RPS) is a powerful error control technique for video streaming. Previously, two fast block-based motion vector concatenation (MVC) algorithms were proposed for video transcoding based on forward dominant vector selection (FDVS) and activity dominant vector selection (ADVS). In this paper, we examine the use of these algorithms in RPS, in the context of video transmission. We also present a novel pixel-based MVC scheme for RPS. Experimental results indicate that the proposed method provides higher video quality compared to both the FDVS and ADVS. In addition, we study the complexity of various RPS algorithms as a function of the loss rate and round trip time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.878
Threshold uncertainty score0.262

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it