MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2155835119 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2011.6030514

A combination of open and closed-loop control for disturbance rejection

2011· article· en· W2155835119 on OpenAlex
Lu Jin, Lyndon J. Brown

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdaptive Control of Nonlinear Systems
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDisturbance (geology)Control theory (sociology)Controller (irrigation)WidebandOpen-loop controllerComputer scienceLoop (graph theory)Internal modelAdaptive controlClosed loopStability (learning theory)Control (management)Control engineeringEngineeringMathematicsElectronic engineeringArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A control strategy for rejecting disturbances consisting of predictable and unpredictable components is presented. This control strategy implements a switching mechanism so that an adaptive internal model principle (IMP) controller switches between open loop and closed-loop modes. A wideband disturbance controller is active in both modes to minimize unpredictable disturbances. The adaptive IMP controller operates in closed-loop mode when it is determined that there is a predictable disturbance not being perfectly cancelled. Otherwise its input is removed and it continues to cancel the identified disturbance in an open loop manner. With this control strategy, the wideband controller can be made more aggressive in minimizing the unpredictable disturbance while maintaining the stability margins and control actions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.851
Threshold uncertainty score0.219

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdaptive Control of Nonlinear SystemsFrench-language works237,207