Deux révolutions tranquilles ? Transformations politiques et sociales au Québec et au Nouveau-Brunswick (1960-1967)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cette étude présente les résultats d’un examen comparatif des changements sociopolitiques qui ont lieu au Québec et au Nouveau-Brunswick entre 1960 et 1967. L’exercice est effectué dans le but avoué de vérifier l’idée répandue selon laquelle la Révolution tranquille est un phénomène purement québécois qui ne saurait trouver d’équivalents ailleurs. La comparaison permet d’affirmer sans ambages que le Nouveau-Brunswick connaît, durant cette période, des transformations d’une ampleur égale et d’une nature très similaire à celles qui ont lieu au Québec. Mais elle nous en apprend aussi très long sur les origines idéologiques et culturelles de la Révolution tranquille québécoise, et nous amène à sérieusement remettre en question l’importance du « néonationalisme » dans la genèse du phénomène.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".