MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2155854760 · doi:10.1002/jnr.10223

GABA‐B‐related activity in processing of transcallosal response in cat motor cortex

2002· article· en· W2155854760 on OpenAlexaff
Syed A. Chowdhury, Ken Ichi Matsunami

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neuroscience Research · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBicucullineNeuroscienceGABA receptor antagonistGABAA receptorStimulationGABAB receptorChemistryMotor cortexNeurotransmissiongamma-Aminobutyric acidPsychologyReceptorBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

GABA-ergic characteristics of transcallosal (TC) responses were studied with specific antagonists of both GABA-A and GABA-B receptor subtypes. We used a paired-pulse paradigm to get insight into the role of GABA in interhemispheric interactions between motor cortices. 3-Amino-2-(4-chlorophenyl)-propylphosphonic acid (phaclofen) and 3-aminopropyl-diethoxymethyl-phosphinic acid (CGP 35348) were used as GABA-B antagonists and bicuculline methiodide (BMI) was used to block the GABA-A receptor. Although both GABA-A and GABA-B antagonists increased spike discharge upon transcallosal stimulation, in both pyramidal tract and non-pyramidal tract neurons, they had different effects on the responses to the first and second stimuli of paired-pulse stimulation (200 msec interval). Although the inhibition seen with the second stimulus was greatly attenuated by antagonists of the GABA-B receptor, it was maintained in the presence of the GABA-A antagonist. These finding support a presynaptic regulation of callosal transmission by GABA-B receptors in the callosal synapse of the cat motor cortex.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.201
GPT teacher head0.446
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Neuroscience ResearchSame topicNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchFrench-language works237,207