MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2155862467 · doi:10.1109/cip.2010.5604235

Real-world particle filtering-based speech enhancement

2010· article· en· W2155862467 on OpenAlexaff
Frédéric Mustière, Miodrag Bolić, Martin Bouchard

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSpeech and Audio Processing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpeech enhancementNoise (video)Computer scienceSpeech recognitionWhite noiseGaussian noiseSpectral densityNoise powerMicrophoneAdditive white Gaussian noiseGradient noiseNoise measurementValue noiseAlgorithmNoise reductionPower (physics)Artificial intelligenceNoise floorTelecommunicationsPhysicsSound pressure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a viable particle filtering (PF) solution for single microphone speech enhancement in real-world conditions, i.e., operating at low SNR in nonstationary noise environments, while remaining computationally tractable. The enhancement takes place in the subband domain with elementary PFs in each band. To efficiently handle complex noise situations, the noise spectrum is modelled in each band as a white Gaussian noise sequence with a time-varying gain. Two solutions are proposed to estimate these time-varying average subband noise levels: they are either drawn internally by the PFs, or they are obtained by external dedicated noise power spectral density estimation - both methods are found to yield very close results. Several subband decompositions are tested, and a robust way of incorporating perceptual constraining is introduced. The assembled PF-based architecture is then compared with state-of-the-art enhancement algorithms in various conditions, and is found to outperform them according to seven objective speech quality measures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.246
Threshold uncertainty score0.650

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSpeech and Audio ProcessingFrench-language works237,207