A Simplified Early Auditory Model with Application in Speech/Music Classification
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The past decade has seen extensive research on audio classification and segmentation algorithms. However, the effect of background noise on the performance of classification has not been investigated widely. Recently, an early auditory model that calculates a so-called auditory spectrum has been employed in audio classification where excellent performance is reported along with robustness in noisy environment. Unfortunately, this early auditory model is characterized by high computational requirements and the use of nonlinear processing. In this paper, by introducing certain modifications we propose a simplified version of this model which is linear except for the calculation of the square-root value of the energy. A speech/music classification task is carried out to evaluate the classification performance wherein a support vector machine (SVM) is used as the classifier. Compared to a conventional FFT-based spectrum, both the original auditory spectrum and the proposed simplified auditory spectrum show more robust performance in noisy test cases. Test results also indicate that, with a reduced computational complexity, the performance of the proposed simplified auditory spectrum is close to that of the original auditory spectrum
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".