MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2155884289 · doi:10.1542/peds.2013-1505

Asymptomatic Viral Gastrointestinal Infection: The Missing Link?

2014· article· en· W2155884289 on OpenAlexaff
Tyler Peikes, Juan Pablo Appendino

Bibliographic record

VenuePEDIATRICS · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicViral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ManitobaWinnipeg Regional Health Authority
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAsymptomaticDifferential diagnosisIctalPediatricsAsymptomatic carrierGastrointestinal bleedingEpilepsyInternal medicinePathologyPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present the case of an 8-month-old boy who presented with apparent life-threatening events later characterized as seizures in clusters. A total of 14 apneic episodes were observed within 24 hours before loading the patient with phenobarbital at which point the seizures stopped. There was no obvious explanation for his seizures. EEG revealed midline interictal discharges; MRI-head was normal; and all other investigations were normal. The patient's stool was sent for virology with the clinical suspicion of benign infantile seizures associated with mild gastroenteritis (BISMG) despite lack of gastrointestinal symptoms. A small round virus was found. His clinical course followed the same progression as typical BISMG. This begs the question whether it is possible for virus in the stool to cause an asymptomatic gastrointestinal infection with its only clinical manifestation as seizures. We conclude that it may be possible for BISMG to present without gastrointestinal symptoms. As well, BISMG may be an unrecognized cause of apparent life-threatening events and should be considered in the differential diagnosis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.004
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0050.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePEDIATRICS→Same topicViral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology→French-language works237,207→