MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2155889226 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2002.1012982

Multifractal characterization for classification of telecommunications traffic

2003· article· en· W2155889226 on OpenAlexaff
Ronan Barry, Witold Kinsner

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicInternet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMultifractal systemComputer scienceTraffic classificationFractal dimensionFractalNormalization (sociology)Artificial intelligenceProbabilistic logicPattern recognition (psychology)MathematicsComputer networkQuality of service

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A novel multifractal approach to telecommunications traffic classification is presented as an improvement over traditional traffic classifiers. The fundamental advantages of using multifractal measures include normalization and a very high compression ratio of a signature of the traffic, thus leading to more reliable and faster implementations, and the ability to add new traffic classes without redesigning the traffic classifier. The variance fractal dimension trajectory is used to provide a multifractal "signature" for each type of traffic over its duration. As a multifractal, the Renyi dimension spectrum is constructed to show the unique characteristics of each type of traffic. A probabilistic neural network is trained with the variance fractal dimension trajectory of the traffic, and has demonstrated 90.7% classification accuracy with a 585:1 compression ratio, and 90.4% classification accuracy with a 1024:1 compression ratio.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicInternet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-votingFrench-language works237,207