Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Since the late 20 th century, we have witnessed the development of a new interdisciplinary field called ‘choreomusicology’ or ‘choreomusical studies’. In this article, consideration is first given to the histories of the two disciplines music and dance. Their respective lineages are discussed in terms of how each is different, yet how together, they inform the new field. The focus then is on choreomusical analysis, using examples from western theatre dance. Frameworks for analysis are discussed, first, how intermedia research can inform choreomusical theory, then rhythmic strategies, when a flexible concept of parallelism and counterpoint is illustrated through two Stravinsky settings: Pina Bausch’s – Das Frühlingsopfer ( Rite of Spring , 1975) and Bronislava Nijinska’s Les Noces (1923). Following discussion of musical embodiment through dance, the theory of conceptual blending is outlined and used in analysis of the Lament from Mark Morris’s setting of Purcell’s Dido and Aeneas (1989).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.013 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it