MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Diagnosis and treatment of atopic dermatitis in children and adults: European Academy of Allergology and Clinical Immunology/American Academy of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology/PRACTALL Consensus Report

2006· review· en· W2155912911 on OpenAlexaff
Cezmi A. Akdiş, Mübeccel Akdiş, Thomas Bieber, Carsten Bindslev‐Jensen, Mark Boguniewicz, Philippe Eigenmann, Qutayba Hamid, Alexander Kapp, Donald Y.M. Leung, Jasna Lipozenčić, Thomas A. Luger, Antonella Muraro, Natalija Novak, Thomas A.E. Platts‐Mills, Lanny J. Rosenwasser, Annika Scheynius, F. Estelle R. Simons, Jonathan M. Spergel, Kristiina Turjanmaa, Ulrich Wahn, Stephan Weidinger, Thomas Werfel, Torsten Zuberbier

Bibliographic record

VenueAllergy · 2006
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDermatology and Skin Diseases
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ManitobaMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAtopic dermatitisAllergyClinical immunologyGuidelineAsthmaTask forceImmunologyConsensus conferenceAtopyFamily medicinePediatricsPathologyInternal medicinePolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There are remarkable differences in the diagnostic and therapeutic management of atopic dermatitis practiced by dermatologists and pediatricians in different countries. Therefore, the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology and the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology nominated expert teams who were given the task of finding a consensus to serve as a guideline for clinical practice in Europe as well as in North America. The consensus report is part of the PRACTALL initiative, which is endorsed by both academies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.344
Teacher spread0.316 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations738
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAllergySame topicDermatology and Skin DiseasesFrench-language works237,207