MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2155928202 · doi:10.1002/2014jb011596

Volcanic tremor and frequency gliding during dike intrusions at Kılauea—A tale of three eruptions

2015· article· en· W2155928202 on OpenAlexafffund
K. Unglert, M. Jellinek

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
Topicearthquake and tectonic studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institute for Advanced Research
KeywordsDikeGeologyMagmaSeismologyVolcanoIntrusionLavaImpact craterPhase (matter)PetrologyPhysicsGeochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract To characterize syneruptive/intrusive deviations from background volcanic tremor at Kı̄lauea, Hawai‘i, we analyze the spatial and temporal properties of broadband tremor during dike intrusions into the East Rift Zone (ERZ) in 2007 and 2011, as well as during explosive eruptive activity at Kı̄lauea's summit in 2008. Background tremor was similar for each event, and the 2008 explosions did not affect its properties. In contrast, the intrusions were accompanied by departures from this background in the form of two phases of seismicity that were separated in space and time. In both 2007 and 2011, Phase I was characterized by a quick succession of discrete events, which were most intense at the onset of intrusion near the presumed locations of the dikes intruding into the ERZ. Phase II, marked by continuous broadband tremor around the summit, followed 10–14 h later. In 2007, Phase II tremor was accompanied by a monotonic downward shift (glide) of spectral peaks between ∼0.6 and 1.5 Hz over at least 15 h. During Phase II in 2011, a gradual upward and subsequent symmetric downward glide between ∼0.6 and 6.6 Hz occurred over 5–10 h, respectively. The spectra during both phases differed from the background and 2008, as well as from each other, indicating different physical mechanisms. Phase I in 2007 and 2011 is probably related to the mechanics of dike intrusion. Phase II tremor may be characteristic for evolving magma‐bubble dynamics related to the geometry of the plumbing system and the style of magma flow.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.078
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Geophysical Research Solid EarthSame topicearthquake and tectonic studiesFrench-language works237,207