Prevalence of Inadequate Vitamin D Status and Associated Factors in Children With Cystic Fibrosis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to determine the prevalence of inadequate serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) levels in a pediatric Canadian cystic fibrosis (CF) population and to assess the effectiveness of a vitamin D supplementation protocol on improving vitamin D status. A secondary objective was to analyze factors that may be associated with inadequate 25(OH)D levels. METHODS: Vitamin D supplementation, 25(OH)D levels, and factors hypothesized to be associated with 25(OH)D levels were collected through a retrospective chart review (2010 and 2011) of 96 patients (1-18 years) at one CF clinic in Canada. Adequacy of 25(OH)D was set at ≥75 nmol/L. Patients with inadequate 25(OH)D levels in 2010 were prescribed an additional 1000 IU/d for levels <60 nmol/L or 400 IU/d for levels 60-75 nmol/L. RESULTS: Inadequate 25(OH)D levels were observed in 26% of patients in 2010 and 23% in 2011. After supplementation was increased for those with inadequate 25(OH)D levels in 2010 (n = 20), a significant increase in 25(OH)D levels was observed in 2011 (P = .03). Adequate status was achieved in 50% of these patients (n = 10). Age was significantly negatively associated with 25(OH)D levels in both years (P = .002). Percentage of forced expiratory volume in 1 second was significantly positively associated with 25(OH)D levels in 2011 (P = .03). CONCLUSION: While vitamin D supplementation was effective at increasing serum 25(OH)D, this protocol did not achieve optimal serum 25(OH)D levels in 25% of the population. Increasing age had the strongest association with 25(OH)D. Current supplementation protocols may require reevaluation based on emerging evidence and revised Cystic Fibrosis Foundation guidelines.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".