MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2155946509 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2007.120

Visual Servoing of a 5-DOF Mobile Manipulator Using a Panoramic Vision System

2007· article· en· W2155946509 on OpenAlexaff
Y. Zhang, Mehran Mehrandezh

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Vision and Imaging
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Regina
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer visionVisual servoingArtificial intelligenceImage planeComputer scienceRobustness (evolution)Jacobian matrix and determinantRobot end effectorExtended Kalman filterKalman filterRobotImage (mathematics)Mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, a novel visual servoing technique for a S-DOF mobile manipulator with an eye-to-hand camera configuration is introduced. The proposed technique can be categorized as an image based (or 2D) visual servoing using a fixed camera in conjunction with a conic mirror (aka, an omni-directional camera system) providing panoramic vision. Two fictitious landmarks mounted on robot's end-effector along with their mirror reflections, when viewed by the camera, provide enough information for 3D reasoning based on the four points viewed on the image plane. Instead of directly using the image features associated with these four points, five new image features are chosen to make the image Jacobian of full rank. A dual estimation/control strategy based on Extended Kalman Filter (EKF) is utilized to (I) estimate camera's intrinsic and extrinsic parameters, and (2) track the coordinates of the landmarks and their reflections on the image plane. The relationship between the translational and rotational velocity of a frame attached to the robot's end-effector and rate of change of the proposed image features are fully formulated The robustness of the proposed visual servoing technique is illustrated through computer simulations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.949
Threshold uncertainty score0.393

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.317 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Vision and ImagingFrench-language works237,207