MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2155950375 · doi:10.5897/ajbm2013.7009

Vyama, Instutuions of hope: Ordinary people's market coordination and society organization. Mary Njeri Kinyanjui. Oakville, Ontario, Canada: Nsemia Inc. Publishers 2012. ISBN: 9781926909249, p. 90

2013· article· en· W2155950375 on OpenAlex
Faith Maina

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueAFRICAN JOURNAL OF BUSINESS MANAGEMENT · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAfrican history and culture analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFirewoodPoolingRidgeEconomic historyGeographyHistoryPolitical scienceArchaeologyCartographyComputer scienceArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Growing up in rural Kenya in the 1970’s and 80’s, the ngwatio concept (loosely translated as pooling together in Gikuyu language) was well entrenched and practiced. I remember fondly how a mundane activity like cutting trees and ferrying firewood on our backs became bearable because all my age mates would come out and help for the day. We could walk long distances in a group of young girls to help a neighbor harvest corn, potatoes and beans in another ridge, carry the same on our backs and store in the granaries enough to feed the family for a whole season. And then we would in the following weeks spend time hauling jerry cans of water on our backs to help with plastering our neighbor’s house.     Read More [Full Article]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.453
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.177
Teacher spread0.172 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it