MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2155981096 · doi:10.1109/ccece.1997.614843

A hybrid intelligent system architecture for utility demand forecasting

2002· article· en· W2155981096 on OpenAlexafffund
Narate Lertpalangsunti, Christine W. Chan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnergy Load and Power Forecasting
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Regina
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsComputer scienceIntelligent decision support systemExpert systemArtificial neural networkKnowledge baseArtificial intelligenceKnowledge-based systemsLegal expert systemFuzzy logicArchitectureHybrid systemMachine learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An architectural framework is proposed for the design and construction of hybrid load forecasting systems for electric utilities. This framework consists of the intelligent techniques of artificial neural networks, fuzzy logic, knowledge-based and case-based reasoning. The knowledge-based system is the core of the integration since it is used to supervise the operations of the other intelligent techniques. Experts can also represent their knowledge in rules to refine and validate the results obtained from the other modules of neural networks and case-based reasoning. The framework was implemented on an object oriented real-time expert system shell G2 with General Diagnostic Assistant (GDA) and NeurOn-Line. In this environment, the intelligent techniques are encapsulated in blocks, which communicate with each other via data paths. The blocks can interact with rules in the knowledge base via rule-terminals. Procedures can be invoked by rules.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.867
Threshold uncertainty score0.576

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.172 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEnergy Load and Power ForecastingFrench-language works237,207