Longitudinal evidence on the association between interleukin-6 and C-reactive protein with the loss of total appendicular skeletal muscle in free-living older men and women
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: there is no longitudinal evidence about the association between the loss of total appendicular skeletal muscle (TASM) and cytokines. OBJECTIVE: to investigate whether high levels of the inflammatory markers such as interleukin-6 (IL-6) and C-reactive protein (CRP) are associated with the loss of TASM in free-living non-sarcopenic older people. DESIGN: five-year prospective cohort study. SUBJECTS: one hundred and fifteen free-living non-sarcopenic older men and women aged 60-84 years at baseline and 5-year follow-up were included. METHODS: TASM was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, and the relative change in TASM was calculated. The response variable was the loss of TASM defined as the lowest sex-specific 15th percentile of the cohort distribution of percentage of change in TASM. The exposure variables were the baseline serum IL-6 and CRP levels measured by ELISA. RESULTS: sixteen subjects were below the sex-specific 15th percentile of the cohort. The mean absolute loss of TASM in these men and women subjects was 1.9 and 1.3 kg, respectively. The risk of loss TASM was 1.29 times higher (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-1.64) (P = 0.03) per unit of increase in IL-6 (pg/ml) and 1.28 times higher (95% CI, 1.04-1.58) (P = 0.01) per unit of increase in CRP (mg/l). As a categorical variable, the risk of loss TASM was 4.85 times higher (95% CI, 1.24-18.97) among subjects with serum IL-6 >2.71 pg/ml and 3.97 times higher (CI 95%, 1.09-14.39) among subjects with serum CRP >3.74 mg/l. These findings remained after adjusting for age, sex and 5-year weight change. CONCLUSIONS: inflammation is associated with the loss of TASM in free-living non-sarcopenic older men and women.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".