MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2156022850 · doi:10.1109/acc.2009.5159998

Path following using transverse feedback linearization: Application to a maglev positioning system

2009· article· en· W2156022850 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMagnetic Bearings and Levitation Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaglevControl theory (sociology)Feedback linearizationLinearizationController (irrigation)Control engineeringPath (computing)Magnetic levitationControl systemComputer scienceStability (learning theory)Transverse planeEngineeringFeedback controllerControl (management)Nonlinear systemMagnetPhysicsMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article presents an approach to path following control design based on transverse feedback linearization. A ldquotransversalrdquo controller is designed to drive the output of the plant to the path. A ldquotangentialrdquo controller meets application-specific requirements on the path, such as speed regulation and internal stability. This methodology is applied to a five degree-of-freedom (5-DOF) magnetically levitated positioning system. Experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of our control design.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.763
Threshold uncertainty score0.484

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations43
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMagnetic Bearings and Levitation DynamicsFrench-language works237,207